Contents |
Introduction: In September 2025, Microsoft is implementing significant changes to its Services Provider License Agreement (SPLA) program, aiming to address misuse and align the program with its original intent. These changes will have far-reaching implications for various stakeholders in the hosting ecosystem, including Microsoft itself, listed providers like AWS and Azure, SPLA partners, and users. Understanding these changes and planning accordingly is crucial for businesses to ensure a smooth transition and mitigate potential disruptions.
Problem Statement: Microsoft has identified misuse of the SPLA program, particularly by managed service providers, who are hosting customer workloads on third-party data centers instead of their own. This misuse has led to revenue loss for Microsoft, as it cannot directly license these workloads to the listed providers.
Solution: To address this issue, Microsoft will restrict the outsourcing of SPLA licenses to listed provider data centers starting October 2022. Existing deployments have until September 30, 2025, to transition either by moving workloads to their own data centers or licensing directly from the listed provider outside of SPLA.
Microsoft’s 2022 licensing updates fundamentally alter how businesses use SPLA (Service Provider License Agreement) licenses in cloud environments. Here’s what you need to know:
Prior Workflow: Managed Service Providers (MSPs) could purchase SPLA licenses directly from Microsoft and deploy workloads on Listed Providers (AWS, Azure, Google, Alibaba). This allowed MSPs to "rent" Microsoft software on hyperscaler infrastructure at lower costs.
New Rule: Effective September 30, 2025, MSPs cannot use their own SPLA licenses on Listed Providers’ infrastructure.
✔️Allowed: Listed Providers (e.g., AWS) can still sell their own SPLA licenses (e.g., "license-included" EC2 instances).
✖️Prohibited: MSPs reselling Microsoft software on AWS/Azure using their own SPLA licenses.
To continue using Microsoft software on AWS, Azure, or Google:
Option 1: Purchase SPLA licenses directly from the hyperscaler (e.g., AWS’s "license-included" pricing).
Licensing Directly with listed providers will be the simplest option, but may see increased costs.Option 2: Use BYOL (Bring Your Own License) with an Enterprise Agreement (EA) or subscription license.
BYOL is very complex to manage, and will come with additional audit risks.Key Impact: Hyperscalers’ SPLA offerings are typically more expensive than third-party MSP rates, erasing cost-saving arbitrage opportunities.
What’s Still Allowed: MSPs can use SPLA licenses on non-listed providers (e.g., regional data centers, colocation facilities) if they control the infrastructure.
Trade-Offs: Non-listed providers often lack the scalability of hyperscalers, limiting burst capacity for dynamic workloads
Microsoft believes the SPLA program, originally intended for partners offering hosted services from their own data centers, is being misused by managed service providers. These providers are purchasing SPLA licenses and then hosting customer workloads on third-party data centers like AWS, Azure, or others ("Listed Providers") instead of their own.
Quote: "At its inception, SPLA was intended to allow partners to offer hosted services from their own datacenters, not for managed service providers buying through SPLA to host on others’ datacenters. We are making changes to the SPLA program, starting in October 2022, to better align with the program’s intent, and with other commercial licensing programs. To strengthen the hoster ecosystem by focusing the program on breadth hosters and encourage traditional outsourcers and datacenter providers, we are changing the SPLA terms to remove the ability to outsource SPLA licenses on Listed Provider datacenters. Traditional outsourcers and datacenter providers will benefit from this change, and it will help foster the hosting partner ecosystem. Any SPLA partner impacted by this change has until September 30, 2025 to transition from a Listed Provider for SPLA outsourced hosting or to license directly from the Listed Provider outside of their SPLA."
Close the "Rental Arbitrage" Loophole: MSPs could previously undercut the listed provider's hyperscaler pricing by reselling SPLA licenses on cheaper third-party clouds, and then outsource SPLA workflows back to listed providers.
Push Adoption of Azure and CSP-Hoster: Microsoft incentivizes partners to use its Azure ecosystem or CSP-Hoster program for hosted solutions.
Increase Licensing Revenue: SPLA price hikes (effective 2025) and reduced flexibility ensure higher long-term revenue. Microsoft is looking to increase revenue by closing a loophole which it believes lead to license sharing, where MSPs with license designed for smaller servers are able to scale up by outsourcing their SPLA workflows to larger servers such as AWS, or Azure.
For MSPs: Migrate workloads to non-listed providers or absorb higher hyperscale licensing costs.
For End Users: Expect price hikes for cloud-hosted Microsoft software and stricter compliance audits.
Strategic Takeaway:
"Microsoft’s changes prioritize control over its ecosystem. Businesses reliant on SPLA must now choose between reduced flexibility, higher costs, or migrating to open formats (PDF/HTML) to minimize licensing risks."
As Microsoft imposes restrictions on SPLA licenses, Users currently outsourcing SLPA to a listed provider will need to take action by September 30th, 2025.
Timeline | Action Required |
---|---|
October 2022 | Rule changes announced. |
September 30, 2025 | Deadline to stop outsourcing SPLA to Listed Providers. |
January 2025 | SPLA price increases (10–17%) take effect. |
While many businesses may choose to abide by the new licensing terms set by Microsoft, some organizations, particularly those focused on archival purposes with a vast array of documents, may find it advantageous to transition away from DOCX formats to PDF. Here are some reasons why:
By transitioning to PDF for document archival purposes, businesses can enjoy cost savings, ensure long-term compatibility, enhance document security, and simplify document management processes. Moreover, PDF's ability to preserve formatting, reduce file size, and facilitate searchability makes it an ideal choice for businesses with extensive archival needs.
In light of the upcoming changes to Microsoft SPLA licensing terms, businesses engaged in frequent publishing of content may find it advantageous to consider transitioning away from DOCX formats to HTML. Here are some reasons why:
By transitioning to HTML for content publishing and structured data, businesses can not only avoid potential licensing issues but also unlock opportunities for content reuse, automation, and dynamic publishing. Embracing structured data standards like DITA enables businesses to organize their content effectively, streamline workflows, and deliver content in a more efficient and impactful manner.
Antenna House OSDC (Office Server Document Converter) is a versatile document conversion solution designed to seamlessly convert various document formats, including DOCX, to PDF or HTML. With its robust capabilities, OSDC offers businesses a flexible and efficient way to store their files as PDF or HTML on cloud server environments. Here's an overview of OSDC and its potential benefits:
Document Conversion Flexibility:
High-Quality Output:
Batch Processing Capabilities:
Scalability and Performance:
By leveraging Antenna House OSDC for document conversion, businesses can effectively store their files as PDF or HTML on cloud server environments, ensuring compatibility, accessibility, and long-term preservation of their documents. With its advanced features, flexibility, and seamless integration with cloud platforms, OSDC offers a compelling solution for businesses seeking efficient document management in the cloud era.
References & Sources
Compliance & Accessibility
Awards
Contact
Privacy Policy | © 2025 Antenna House, Inc.